Thursday, August 18, 2011
You're Invited!
Wednesday, July 6, 2011
Good News and Bad News About ALDO Vote
Thank you to everyone who sat through the meeting and to those who testified supporting ALDO. The Dane County Coalition to Reduce Alcohol Abuse (DCCRAA) had a great turnout at the meeting! Thank you everyone so much for your hard work and many hours spent in evening meetings on this issue.
So the good news: ALDO passed.
The bad news: this new version of ALDO is a significantly weaker and watered down version of its former self.
So here's what we have on the books to limit the number of alcohol-outlets downtown in order to curb the alcohol-related violence, crime and destruction in an environment where over-consumption is not only accepted but almost encouraged every weekend.
- ALDO will be around for the next two years, with a sunset date of this time in 2013.
- There is a new exemption for Entertainment Venues that allows such establishments to have up to 70 percent alcohol revenue. This includes establishments with activities such as board games, volleyball and shuffleboard. Bar or "entertainment venue", you tell me. The number of these venues allowed to open downtown will be capped at seven though.
- One change the DCCRAA did make sure was made was eliminating the ability for these establishments to apply for a Class A liquor license - off-premise alcohol sales. This was in the amendments to be voted on on ALDO last night and was apparently a mistake that was caught and removed.
- The window of time to open a new bar or tavern after an existing bar or tavern closes was 365 days in the original ALDO but has been doubled in this new ALDO to 730 days.
- The Exceptional Circumstance clause of ALDO originally granted a 25 percent allowable alcohol revenue. This is for businesses that provide other goods or services but also have some alcohol sales, such a Savior Faire on the Capital Square. In this new ALDO, the allowable alcohol revenue has been increased from 25 percent to 50 percent.
- A good addition to ALDO that has come out of this debate is that an annual review of ALDO and the ALDO district is now required, which will be completed by the Alcohol Policy Coordinator for the city.This annual review will collect the appropriate data needed to properly asses the ordinance.
- Another outcome of the great public testimony from ALDO supporters at last night's meeting was the inclusion of the Public Health Department and the Madison Police Department participation in part of the ALDO resolution voted on last night that charges the City to create a business-friendly alcohol license plan for the ALDO district.
Tuesday, June 21, 2011
Where's Aldo? - We need you or we may lose it for good!
![]() |
Credit: Flickr - Scutter |
For more information visit our website by clicking here.
Not Every Risk Pays Off

Not every risk pays off
It’s no surprise that drunk driving is never a wise decision, but many times people have the idea in their heads that “it won’t happen to me.” Maybe that’s what Ryan Dunn, star of MTV’s popular show “Jackass” and avid risk-taker, thought as well. But despite all of Dunn’s stunts (from frightening, to funny, to foolish) his life was ended short by a poor decision to get behind the wheel when intoxicated.
Crashes while driving intoxicated can happen to you, your friends and your family. In fact, according to data from a car insurance company, 30 U.S. citizens die every day in car accidents with alcohol-impaired drivers. That’s one death every 48 minutes!
But maybe you don’t drink and drive—you make responsible decisions and want a safer and healthier life for you and your family. That doesn’t mean you are safe from those drivers that do decide to get behind the wheel after drinking. And as a citizen of Wisconsin how safe are you? Wisconsin currently has the worst drunk driving rate in the nation, and in 2009 Wisconsin was ranked the 11th state in terms of highest percentage of DUI related deaths. And those are just the reported deaths. Think of how many more people get behind the wheel and cause crashes with injuries, or crashes that aren’t even reported.
And then there are those that drink and drive and get away with it—it’s probable that Ryan Dunn had driven drunk more than once. But no one should assume that every time you get behind the wheel you’ll be just as lucky as the last time. Because that’s just what it is—luck. No one is “skilled” or “good at” driving drunk. Each time a person makes the foolish, irresponsible and destructive decision to drive while intoxicated they have an increased chance of causing fatalities or harm to themselves and others as well as legality issues.
Driving while drunk can be heavily attributed to abusive alcohol use which hinders a person’s ability to make wise decisions and furthermore inhibits their ability to drive. Health First wants a healthier Wisconsin, a safer Wisconsin for families. In order to do so, we need to move towards reducing alcohol abuse so that people are able to make good decisions while still enjoying non-risky drinking behavior. This will lead to things like less money being put towards law enforcement pursuing alcohol-related crimes, including cracking down on drunk driving. What’s more, it will save lives.
If you would like more resources on how to prevent alcohol abuse, please visit our webpage at: http://www.healthfirstwi.org/alcohol/resources.php.
Stay safe and make positive choices!
Thursday, May 5, 2011
Mifflin - Need I say more?
![]() |
Flickr - MJKauz |
If you live in Madison, it's hard to miss the recap of this past weekend's Mifflin event and the horrors that took place...
One shattered kneecap after a victim was hit with a baseball bat...
Two separate stabbings and at least two sexual assaults...
Three MPD officers injured...
The list, unfortunately, goes on and on. Mifflin was a disaster but good can come from it. Mifflin is the culmination of a growing alcohol abuse problem that plagues not only Madison, but Dane County and Wisconsin. It's time to step up and prevent risky and problem drinking and, fortunately, there are evidence-based strategies that we can pursue in order to do this.
To reduce alcohol abuse we have to reduce what those in the field call the "Four A's":
Making alcohol less Available, Attractive, misuse less Acceptable and less Affordable. Can you see where Mifflin went wrong?
![]() |
Flickr - MVWorks |
What else can we do? Madison made the right move implementing an alcohol-outlet density ordinance in downtown a few years ago, but that very ordinance could potentially sunset if our city officials don't vote it through by July 5th. Alcohol-outlet density ordinances are evidence-based strategies to reduce violent crime in an area saturated by bars. Studies worldwide show that if you reduce the number of alcohol outlets...there's that A again (availability)... you will reduce violence and crime in that area. So we must protect the alcohol-outlet density ordinance, keep it strong and make it permanent.
The Dane County Coalition to Reduce Alcohol Abuse is happy to work with the city and other policy-makers and stake-holders to reduce the very real, very negative and very costly burden of alcohol abuse that was so blatantly depicted in last weekends event. Mifflin can and should be a learning experience for all of us that it is time to address the alcohol misuse present in Madison and help the businesses, families, students and all those that live work and play in this area thrive.
Want to hear more about what went down on Mifflin Saturday? Click here.
For more evidence-based strategies to prevent alcohol abuse, click here.
Wednesday, March 23, 2011
FTC Needs Your Input! - Does Self-Regulation of Alcohol Beverage Manufacturers Work?
So here's where you come in. The FTC is looking for public comment on the proposed collection of data from alcohol manufacturers, the first step they must take in order to conduct their study. The topics they are looking to include are:
- "the companies' compliance with voluntary advertising placement provisions, sales and marketing expenditures;
- the status of third-party review of complaints regarding compliance with voluntary advertising codes; and
- alcohol industry data-collection practices."
The Marin Institute has also released a report on this topic titled, "Why Big Alcohol Can't Police Itself A Review of Advertising Self-Regulation in the Distilled Spirits Industry." It's definitely worth checking out. The report examines the code previsions the Industry is supposed to "voluntarily" follow, the number of complaints against ads violating these codes and follow-up action taken.
Let FTC know how you feel about the Alcohol Industry's self-regulation. Does it work? It doesn't take much looking into before coming to the easy conclusion of... no.
Tuesday, March 15, 2011
It's That Time Again! The Alcohol License Review Committee Meeting!
The changes include: